Enjoy the best grades that will raise your GPA.

Category: Ancient Literature

Write a rhetorical analysis of the “Introduction” to The Assault on Reason, by A

Write a rhetorical analysis of the “Introduction” to The Assault on Reason, by Al Gore. Rhetoric is synonymous with persuasion. You are to evaluate how persuasive his argument is. To do so, you need to be methodical.
Your introduction needs to identify, first of all, the author and title of the essay, so your reader knows your topic. Use his full name the first time, and then just his last name for the rest of the essay. Then identify his thesis. A thesis, once again, is the central point of the essay, not the topic. What exactly, does Gore argue in the essay? What does he say, specifically, is the problem, and what does he identify as the solution? The more precise you can be, the better the quality of your evaluation. Be accurate. To identify how the essay attempts to work, you now need to identify one or more of the rhetorical methods. It is not sufficient to say he uses logos or pathos, or even deduction or induction, as these terms are too vague. It is not even specific enough to say he provides analogies or compares things. You need to be more precise. What types of analogies? What does he compare? What types of statistics, etc., does he provide? Consider his links as supporting evidence. In other words, you need to be precise enough that you are describing just this essay’s rhetoric and not rhetoric in general. Finally, your intro needs to include some indication of whether or not the methods he uses adequately support his thesis. This last element is the form your thesis takes.
Major body paragraphs evaluate examples of his rhetoric. Generally, you make a claim about a method he uses, provide an example of it, and then evaluate it. These paragraphs support what your introduction says about how his essay functions. We have been discussing how to evaluate different forms of rhetoric in class, so be sure to be methodical. Test the truth of the premises if you need to. Evaluate validity. Use Mill’s Methods for thinking about induction. Determine if the evidence adequately supports his claims. Consider sufficiency and relevance.
Do not use the first-person pronoun (“I will argue,” “In my opinion”) unless you are providing relevant personal anecdotes. If you do provide personal anecdotes, insert them at the end of your essay after you have provided a thorough evaluation of his rhetoric. If you need to discuss reader response, refer to “the reader” or “readers.” Do not use second person (“you”).
Use the present tense when discussing his essay. “Gore suggests . . .”
Use MLA guidelines (Links to an external site.). (Links to an external site.) Use one-inch margins all around. Double-space all lines (never have extra spacing). Use Times New Roman, size 12 font. The essay needs to be at least three full pages. Turn in your essay as either a Word or RTF document. I will not accept Pages or PDF documents. Do not plagiarize. All students are responsible for understanding plagiarism and the course plagiarism policy.

Write a rhetorical analysis of the “Introduction” to The Assault on Reason, by A

Write a rhetorical analysis of the “Introduction” to The Assault on Reason, by Al Gore. Rhetoric is synonymous with persuasion. You are to evaluate how persuasive his argument is. To do so, you need to be methodical.
Your introduction needs to identify, first of all, the author and title of the essay, so your reader knows your topic. Use his full name the first time, and then just his last name for the rest of the essay. Then identify his thesis. A thesis, once again, is the central point of the essay, not the topic. What exactly, does Gore argue in the essay? What does he say, specifically, is the problem, and what does he identify as the solution? The more precise you can be, the better the quality of your evaluation. Be accurate. To identify how the essay attempts to work, you now need to identify one or more of the rhetorical methods. It is not sufficient to say he uses logos or pathos, or even deduction or induction, as these terms are too vague. It is not even specific enough to say he provides analogies or compares things. You need to be more precise. What types of analogies? What does he compare? What types of statistics, etc., does he provide? Consider his links as supporting evidence. In other words, you need to be precise enough that you are describing just this essay’s rhetoric and not rhetoric in general. Finally, your intro needs to include some indication of whether or not the methods he uses adequately support his thesis. This last element is the form your thesis takes.
Major body paragraphs evaluate examples of his rhetoric. Generally, you make a claim about a method he uses, provide an example of it, and then evaluate it. These paragraphs support what your introduction says about how his essay functions. We have been discussing how to evaluate different forms of rhetoric in class, so be sure to be methodical. Test the truth of the premises if you need to. Evaluate validity. Use Mill’s Methods for thinking about induction. Determine if the evidence adequately supports his claims. Consider sufficiency and relevance.
Do not use the first-person pronoun (“I will argue,” “In my opinion”) unless you are providing relevant personal anecdotes. If you do provide personal anecdotes, insert them at the end of your essay after you have provided a thorough evaluation of his rhetoric. If you need to discuss reader response, refer to “the reader” or “readers.” Do not use second person (“you”).
Use the present tense when discussing his essay. “Gore suggests . . .”
Use MLA guidelines (Links to an external site.). (Links to an external site.) Use one-inch margins all around. Double-space all lines (never have extra spacing). Use Times New Roman, size 12 font. The essay needs to be at least three full pages. Turn in your essay as either a Word or RTF document. I will not accept Pages or PDF documents. Do not plagiarize. All students are responsible for understanding plagiarism and the course plagiarism policy.

© 2022 assignmetshive

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑